MY YEARS IN BOOKS

The Golden Notebook by Doris Lessing

I have embarked on a new project. And this will not be finished in short order. I decided some time ago that I needed to read more fiction. But not just any fiction. It needed to be substantive or at least something that had some small impact on the world. I enjoy reading mysteries for relaxation but find more serious modern fiction unappealing. I’ve decided to pick a book to read from every year that I’ve been on this earth. From the year I was born to now. Each book should be one that had some noted impact, something that had more than just bestseller numbers to make it noteworthy.

I went to the 1962 best books list to pick something to start. That was quite a year for publishing. One Flew Over the Coo Koo’s Nest, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf?, The Man in the High Castle, Another Country, A Clockwork Orange, to name only a few. I settled on Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook. I chose it for its themes: societal and individual fragmentation, communism, sexual liberation, and the women’s movement.

I also decided to widen my reading outside of fiction. Here are some of the books I’ve read recently and the year they were published. More fiction is coming, but it might take a while.

1962

Doris Lessing, The Golden Notebook

The Golden Notebook by Doris Lessing

1963

Hannah Arndt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil

James Baldwin, The Fire Next Time

1964

Martin Luther King Jr., Why We Can’t Wait

1965

Truman Capote, In Cold Blood

PASSING (2021)

A fascinating and beautiful movie set in New York in the 1920s. Based on Nella Larsen’s 1929 novel, the story centers around two friends, both black, who have once again found each other through a brief encounter in a hotel tea room.

Irene (Tessa Thompson) has gone out for the day, attempting to pass as white. A mother of two boys, she is married to a doctor and is living a comfortable life in Harlem. She runs into her old friend Clare (Ruth Negga), although not recognizing her at first, and the two go off Clare’s room and politely reacquaint themselves with each other. Clare is also passing as white. But while Irene’s passing is but for an afternoon, Clare is living her life as white. She and her white husband have a young girl.

As they sit in Clare’s hotel room sipping from a flask, Clare’s husband returns. He has no idea that Clare is black and emphasizes how he hates negros. Irene, who he also believes is white, says nothing of Clare’s secret and leaves. Irene wants nothing more to do with Clare. But Clare is persistent and shows up at Irene’s house in Harlem after writing several unanswered letters. And it is this relationship, this friendship, that takes us on this journey. We are viewing this primarily from Irene’s perspective.

The movie, shot in black and white, follows this relationship as the two women seem to struggle with their well-to-do lives. There is a great deal in this story as it deals with race, racism, sexuality, and gender among others. It is masterfully presented by writer and director Rebecca Hall. Highly recommended.

MODERNISM & ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Visual Acoustics – The Modernism Of Julius Shulman (2009) Documentary (Dir. Eric Bricker)

Considered to be the best known, if not the best, photographer of Architectural Modernism, Julius Shulman is featured during his final years through a whirlwind look at his life’s work. This 2009 documentary, released in the same year as his death at 98 years old, narrated by Dustin Hoffman, is primarily told through photographs, friends, colleagues and participants as they visit several of the classic modern houses.

Shulman’s work, which began in the 1930s, highlights key modernist architects such as Frank Lloyd Wright, Richard Neutra, John Lautner and Frank Gehry. His photography, found in Life Magazine, among other major architectural publications and later books, introduced the world to this movement most noted in the Southern California area.

Shulman’s photos, at times more beautiful than the actual subjects, have been credited with inspiring the movement and architects in the 1950s and 1960s. He maintained his passion throughout his life and commissioned his own modernist house in the Hollywood hills in 1950. While taking some pause during the height of the post-modernist phase – a form he disliked immensely – we see him here in his final year working and discussing the modernist form with confidence and thoughtfulness. His best know work is that of his Case Study #22 photographs (1960) of the Stahl House, designed by architect Pierre Koenig’s, overlooking Los Angeles.

Even for someone like me, who doesn’t care much for modernist architecture, this is an interesting and inspiring documentary. Technically, it lacks most of the beauty and structure of Shulman’s photography, but substantively it offers an intimate look at one of the important contributors to modern architecture and photography. Unfortunately, Hoffman’s limited narration is poorly done and leaves aspects of the historical evolution wanting. Thankfully, it is limited.

Shulman’s larger-than-life personality is the real story. Even in his late 90s, delightful, funny, and comfortably immodest, his joy and passion for modernism in architecture shines through. His enormous body of work, now with the Getty Center in Los Angeles, will live on as the foundation of this period in modern North American architectural history.

HORSEPLAY: MY TIME UNDERCOVER ON THE GRANVILLE STRIP BY NORM BOUCHER

I didn’t have any expectations when I picked out this book. It seemed like it might be an interesting look back at Vancouver in the 1980s. This memoir by former RCMP undercover Staff-Sergeant Norm Boucher, delves into an eight-month undercover heroin operation in Vancouver, specifically around the Granville strip in 1983. Boucher befriends several local heroin users and sets them up in order to gain access to those higher up the drug supply chain. Unfortunately, there is very little that is interesting in this 269-page memoir.

Book Review of Horseplay: My Time Undercover on the Granville Strip

After settling in and trying to gain the trust of his new friends, Boucher gives us some detail on his daily routine, the challenges he faced, a little bit of what he was experiencing emotionally as he tries to sell himself as a heroin user. But there is very little insight, introspection, or self-reflection in this – it’s just the same thing day in and day out. Once we establish a few bits and pieces about the folks he meets and begins to do business with, there is very little else. Does he ever get the bigger guys up the chain? Not really sure – and it hardly seems that some that the operation may have got, weren’t all that far up that chain anyway.

Reading about this time – 1983 – and the drug scene with today’s deeper understanding of the nightmare situation that is occurring on the streets of this city, and applying that to a time 40 years ago, may be a bit unfair, but this book really raises questions about the time, money, and usefulness of such an operation. Boucher doesn’t seem to want to touch on this. He discusses addiction, in a rather small and simplistic way near the end of the book. But he doesn’t challenge his own understanding or the role of the police, public policy and strategy in this situation. He simply tells us what he did, day-to-day. And that gets tedious pretty quickly.

I’m sure he worked from his own notes and had some help with remembering the events that went on during this operation. He talks very little about the investigative team and what they were doing during most of this eight-month indulgence. I’m also rather suspicious of the endless quoted conversations that he had with his various new drug buddies in the beer parlours at the various hotels. He regularly mentions how certain people are suspicious of him – they think he might be a cop. This goes on throughout the book and simply feels like a dramatic device to lead us to believe he was possibly on the verge of having his cover blown. Keep the reader in suspense, somehow, because the basic description of his routine certainly doesn’t.

So this was, even without any expectations one way or another, a disappointing book. While there are bits and pieces that carry you along in places, and this may be enough for some people, it certainly did not have enough to hold me throughout the 269 pages.

Norm Boucher, Horseplay: My Time Undercover on the Granville Strip (Edmonton, Alberta: New West Press, 2020)

PHILIP ROTH BIOGRAPHY HALTED BY PUBLISHER

A few days ago I listened to the New York Times Book Review podcast where Philip Roth biographer Blake Bailey spoke at length with host Pamela Paul about his new book, Philip Roth: The Biography. It was a decent interview, even if a bit skimpy on some pretty interesting areas of Roth’s life and character. I haven’t read much Roth, but I have read a little about him and his work. And I have a penchant for literary biographies, even of those whose work I’m not well versed in.

Well, two days later I read in The New Yorker and the New York Times that Bailey has been accused of sexual assault and inappropriate behaviour with students. Roth denies them. The publisher, W. W. Norton, has stopped shipment of any further books and cancelled publicity for the author and the biography. This, The New Yorker article states, is unusual behaviour for a publisher. Bailey’s literary agent, The Story Factory, has also dropped him as a client.

Besides the horrific and disgusting descriptions of the allegations made by Roth’s accusers, the role of his publisher, W. W. Norton in all of this, is, for lack of a better description right now, rather disturbing. Not for halting further distribution, but because the president of Norton publishing, Julia A. Reidhead, had been made aware of the sexual assault allegation years earlier. A reporter at the New York Times had also been informed by the accuser, anonymously, but when the reporter replied to that email, there was no response.

An anonymous email was also sent to Reidhead by the alleged victim who made clear she would be willing to verify her accusation. She also stated that Bailey would likely recognize her identity if faced with the details. So what did Reidhead do? She passed the anonymous email on to Bailey. Whoa! This was in 2018. The alleged “nonconsensual sex” took place in 2015. I’m not sure how out of touch, morally diminished, or simply clueless one has to be to do such a thing. Bailey responded to his accuser writing that such untrue accusations would be devastating to his daughter and wife.

Julia Reidhead has not responded to reporters’ requests for comment as of this writing, although Norton has issued a response saying that it looked into the allegations, that it was aware the New York Times had been informed of them, and that they confronted Bailey on the matter and he denied the allegations. Norton was aware of the author’s desire to maintain anonymity. It seems to be an odd response, but I’m sure it was completely vetted, if not written, by their lawyers. Whether lawyers were involved in the original instance would be interesting to know. Besides any pursuit of the allegations themselves, I suspect this may have some serious fallout for Reidhead.

There are further disturbing allegations against Bailey that I have not discussed here. Below are just a few links that go into more detail about all this story and all the accusations. Again, Bailey has denied the allegations.

Will Norton quietly release more copies down the road? They say they will not. Many of Roth’s documents that Bailey used are to be destroyed, so this may be the only biography to have such depth of material and access to his personal archives. This also adds another case study to the growing pile of bad people and their behaviour and how we, as a society and as individuals, should respond, consume and assess their work. It is a complex issue and one that is separate from, although completely linked to, the allegations of Bailey’s abhorrent behaviour and harm caused to the alleged victims.

New York Times

The New Yorker

The Times-Picayune

TVTV: VIDEO REVOLUTIONARIES (2018-DOCUMENTARY)

In 1972, Television was nothing like it is today. Well, for the most part. The three US networks were straight-laced, clean-cut, very white, and a good decade or more behind reflecting the changing culture that began to emerge in the 1960s. The Public Broadcasting System was just a collection of stations that shared program content and was in its infancy. In Canada, there were two networks, CBC and CTV, and Cable TV, which offered a number of primarily US channels to subscribers in smaller and remote communities, was in its early expansion years. In both countries, news and events coverage followed similar approaches. Nineteen Seventy-two saw something new. Not only did colour TV sales exceed black and white sets but colour sets were now in half of all homes with TVs. But it was another technological advancement that set a group of youngsters to take on the stodgy old networks and present people with a new way of viewing the modern world.

True Value Television, or TVTV, was formed by Allen Rucker, Michael Shamberg, Tom Weinberg, Hudson Marquez, and Megan Williams. This collective set out to approach and present tv journalism in a new and revolution manner. Using the new technology of the Sony “portapak,” a portable video recording system released in 1968, this young group of social activists set out to change the mainstream three-channel commercial networks with documentary films and coverage of major American events that aired on community access and PBS channels. This was the New Journalism-guerrilla TV style.

Paul Goldsmith, a member of the collective, put together this documentary, TVTV: Video Revolutionaries, using fascinating footage and interviews with members some of those founding members. And there are many a famous, and to be famous faces among those who took part in this endeavour. Bill Murray, just before his SNL debut, Christopher Guess, John Belushi, and Harold Ramis, were all part of this new voice. There were many events like Super Bowl, the 1972 Republican and Democratic conventions, the Cajun Show, and later, after their move from San Fransico to Los Angeles, a failed comedy pilot that NBC never aired. By 1979, the group went their separate ways with little to show.

But this documentary offers a wealth of history, a history not well known, and highlights their attempts at new journalism, satire, comedy with a desire to open up the rather flat and stale mainstream media, to reflect more diverse perspectives and approaches to changing society. Today’s vast media landscape – from top-level networks and film companies, reality TV, independent productions, cheap cameras and computers, multiple viewing platforms, to the millions of YouTubers, TVTV offers a glimpse at the path that was taken, for good and ill, to where we are now.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9150206/

PACIFIC GREAT BLUE HERONS

It’s that time of year when the herons return to nest high in the trees along Deer Lake Avenue in Burnaby. Here are a few shots I took.

They seem to be settling in and doing some home renos.

Click on the images to make them larger and see more detail.

A PHOTO ART EXPERIMENT

I usually take my camera with me on my longer walks. You never know what you might see or come across. The problem is, I’ve walked these same routes many, many times and have taken the same pictures many, many times. On this walk around Deer Lake in Burnaby, I stopped on a whim to take a few ICM shots. I didn’t put much time or thought into them, it was just something a bit different. Quick and dirty.

My interest in photography is fairly conventional. I don’t tend to care much for heavily altered and processed photographs. I just needed to try something new with the familiar scenery.

Intentional Camera Movement can produce some very interesting images, but it is always an experiment, adjusting movement, camera settings, and subject matter to find a final image that stands out. You’re never certain of the shot you’re taking, you have to try it, then look at it, make adjustments, and try again. And yes, there are certain techniques and settings that work best for this. But I’ve only ever experimented with this briefly once a long time ago and I haven’t put much thought into it since.

I stuck to the straight(ish) up and down quick movement. I’ll try some other movements, like rotations and zooming, with this technique at some point.

I wasn’t happy with any of the original shots – until I started playing around in Lightroom and created some interesting results. I wish I could say there was some finely tuned technique that got me here but, honestly, it was just random tweaking. Here are a few of them. Nothing spectacular, just an interesting experiment. I also quickly threw them into a video (it was a quiet afternoon at home).

Cheers
Gerald

https://youtu.be/S99gmqKK9II

DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Photojournalism, digital photography, and the Vancouver Sun Newspaper

Digital photography isn’t anything we give much thought to these days. After all, everything is digital, everyone has a cell phone, everyone, therefore, has a camera. Taking pictures, sending them to friends and family, or posting them on some social media site is an everyday practice. But such instant and easy access to photographs is fairly new, little more than twenty-five years, and The Vancouver Sun found itself on the leading edge of this significant evolution.

The Origins of Digital Photography – 1960s and ’70s

The origins of the digital camera go back to the 1960s where image enhancement was being used and developed by the American space program. The interest in finding a means of capturing images electronically came from the evolution of video recording technology. By the 1970s, Kodak, Canon, and RCA were exploring how to develop an electronic image capturing camera. Steve Sasson, an engineer at Kodak, was researching the use of the charge-couple device (CCD) for image creation and in 1975 presented the first digital camera. He could hold it with both his hands and take a picture and so considered it, amusingly, a hand-held creation. The images would record onto a cassette tape that could then be played back and seen on a TV. The company, however, was not as impressed with this new creation when told that it would likely take 15-20 years before this would be ready for the consumer market.

Kodak’s 1975 digital camera/photo: George Eastman House

Sony, Fuji, Apple, Floppy Disks, and the 1980s

Other companies were also researching and developing digital cameras. Sony’s Mavica non-film electronic camera was seen as the beginning of a new road ahead in 1981. It too had to playback to a TV or monitor from the stored media on a two-inch floppy disk. By the mid-1980s photojournalists were experimenting with early digital cameras and recognizing that it would lead to dramatic changes in how photos were stored, edited, and transmitted for publications. This would also have major implications for the average consumer, professional photographers, and photography buffs. Fuji presented a camera that recorded images to an SRAM card in 1988 but it wasn’t really until the debut of Apple’s QuickTake in 1994 that we see the first mainstream digital camera. Kodak developed it and sold it for around $1000.

Apple QuickTake 100 Photo by Carl Berkeley

The Kodak NC2000 and the first newspaper to transition to all-digital

Kodak introduced its digital camera system (DCS) with a 1.3-megapixel sensor in a Nikon F3 camera in 1991. The system was aimed at photojournalists. But it wasn’t until 1994 that Kodak teamed up with the Associated Press to offer its members the Kodak NC2000. It was this camera that The Vancouver Sun, the first newspaper to transition to all-digital photography, along with The Province and The Calgary Harold, purchased in its switch to all-digital photography in 1995. Discounted for AP members to $16,950 from its listed $17,950 price, the camera was highly unpopular, as was the transition to digital. But as the ability to transfer pictures quickly and easily improved and the images and functions of the camera technology got better, virtually everyone saw and supported this new technological change. They had no desire to return to the old ways.

Kodak/AP NC2000 / photo: George Eastman House

Sources:
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0602/dunleavy.html

https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/gadgets/the-evolution-of-digital-cameras-from-kodaks-1975-digital-camera-prototype-to-iphone-5727036/

https://www.cnet.com/news/photos-the-history-of-the-digital-camera/

“Unsung Cameras Of Yesteryear: The Kodak NC2000 (Featuring Rob Galbraith),” YouTube uploaded by The Camera Store, 22 May, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BwQ9jS1xKc

Fralic, Shelley. Making Headlines: 100 Years of the Vancouver Sun. Vancouver: Vancouver Sun, 2012.

THE HUNTERS – TV SERIES (2020)

Amazon Prime
Series: 10 eps; Producers: Jordan Peele and David Wier (and others)
Cast: Al Pacino, Dylan Baker, Logan Lerman, Jerrika Hinton, Saul Rubrik, Carole Kane, Josh Radnr, Kate Mulvany

They are out to stop the Fourth Reich that is being perpetrated by exiled Nazi’s in the United States in the mid-1970s. Myer Offerman (Al Pacino) leads a group of highly motivated and, what else but, quirky characters, as they attempt to rid country of these evil people, many of whom were knowingly brought into the country by their own government. Some were placed in high level jobs, others who escaped Germany and ended up in the US with new identities, somehow managed to get into highly influential positions of industry and power. They were now on a new mission, aided by some young modern blood, to continue the work of Hitler.

When nineteen year old Johan Heidelberg (Logan Lerman) watches as his grandmother, a holocaust survivor, is killed in their house, his anger and circumstance bring him to join this group of Nazi hunters on his quest to find her killer. The series uses flash backs to the death camps as the stories are told of the horrific treatment the prisoners went through. Offerman wants to catch a doctor he describes as worse than Josef Mengele.

I don’t know why I watched the whole series. It was evident from episode one that this was a cartoon-ish, Quentin Tarantino-style attempt at dealing with an incredibly horrific reality, while trying to appeal to the super-hero lovers crowd. Show creator David Wier was attempting something of a morality tale, a commentary on government, racism and perhaps sophistry. It’s a different approach to this subject. But it’s violence, mixed with real angst and philosophical discussion do not do enough to take away from the ridiculous comedic antics and overtones of the characters. Despite some good acting performances, it just misses the mark-quite widly.

HORNBY BLUES AT ST. JAMES HALL

On their way to The Hornby Island Blues Workshop, Cécile Doo-Kingué, Tim Williams, Paul Pigat, and Michael Jerome Browne stopped into St. James Hall on a warm and pleasant Friday evening, offering a grand selection of blues and roots music to an enthusiastic crowd. The place was packed.

Like a traditional folk workshop, they cycled from one artist to the next, each playing acoustic guitar and offering originals and interpretations, often bringing in the others for solo and rhythm support. It was a night of wonderful music, relaxed, humorous, and full of spontaneity and great talent.

Paul Pigat

Paul Pigat is likely best known for leading Cousin Harley, an intense rockabilly trio that branches out into blues and country music, although his country outlet is best heard with Boxcar Campfire. He is incredibly versatile, an impressive finger stylist, jazz performer and singer. Seeing him in any style incarnation is always a worthy and entertaining event.

Cécile Doo-Kingué

Cécile Doo-Kingué was born and grew up in New York. She is a citizen of the world now living in Montreal. An impressive guitar player and singer, her sound incorporates Afro-roots, blues and soul influences. She has several albums out, including a trilogy that began with Anybody Listening pt. 1 (20150 and was followed the next year by Anybody Listening pt. 2. She has earned several Maple Blues awards. Her songs are powerful, some are strongly political and personal, her lyrics are vivid and pointed. And on this occasion, her versatile guitar playing was on display along with her warmth and humour.

Tim Williams

Tim Williams, American born, came to Canada in 1970 after several years taking in the California music scene of the mid-1960s. Blues, folk, roots, rock, Hawaiian, and Mexican music are all part of his repertoire. He has a great knowledge of the blues and its history, the different styles from the Delta to Chicago and everywhere in between. More importantly, he demonstrates this deep history with his various guitar blues styles that go back to those early years. His latest album is Corazones Y Murrallas.

Michael Jerome Brown

Michael Jerome Browne is one of Canada’s most significant blues and roots artists on the scene today. He has been nominated and won several folk and blues awards. He is a “multi-instrumentalist, a songwriter, and a living encyclopedia of American Roots music,” as his website states. Browne performed on tour as a one-man band and was a singer and guitarist in the Stephen Barry Band. He has worked extensively with Eric Bibb, co-producing and performing on the 2017 Grammy nominated Migration Blues.

JOHN COLTRANE – AFRO BLUE IMPRESSIONS

If you asked me, “what is jazz?” I’d say, “Listen to this. This is jazz .” There is no other like John Coltrane, and Afro Blue Impressions, recorded at two live performances in Berlin and Stockholm in late 1963, is a great example of his musical genius. Some of his best work was to follow this and his experimentation and various tonal shifts here are a prelude to some of the sounds found in later music. With McCoy Tyner on piano, Elvin Jones on drums, and Jimmy Garrison on bass, this powerful trio pushes Coltrane as he strives to find new places to take his tenor and soprano playing while still maintaining a comfortableness within these tensions. This album gives you a sense of who John Coltrane was, where he was going, and what jazz was about in the early 1960s. From the first time I heard Coltrane’s My Favorite Things when I was a teenager, to today, listening to various versions still feels fresh and exciting to me. Unquestionably one of my favourites.

The 21-minute version of My Favorite Things is such an impressive rendition and Afro Blue seems to carry on some of that same structure but soon finds its own feel with Tyner really leading the piece in a new direction as Coltrane moves in and out of that foundation. Chasin’ The Trane is, well, just fun – a bit of joy, a bit of angst, but only enough to let you know that everything is all good.

The bonus material offers some different takes on cuts already on the album and includes an equally interesting but somewhat different spin on My Favorite Things. This recording feels like a quintessential jazz concert of the early 60s. Such an incredible quartet and such a strong performance by Coltrane at the time. There are some other great live recordings, maybe even better than this, but Afro Blue Impressions is really an excellent window into one of the greatest jazz musicians of the 20th century.

(Original release 1977- Reissue/Remastered with bonus material 2013)

Disc One
1 Lonnie’s Lament (John Coltrane) 10:15
2 Naima (John Coltrane) 8:05
3 Chasin’ The Trane (John Coltrane) 5:45
4 My Favorite Things (Rodgers & Hammerstein) 21:07
5 Afro Blue (Mongo Santamaria) 7:34
6 Cousin Mary (John Coltrane) 9:55
Disc Two
1 I Want To Talk About You (Billy Eckstine) 8:20
2 Spiritual (John Coltrane) 12:29
3 Impressions (John Coltrane) 11:36
(BONUS TRACKS – Not On Original Album)
4 Naima (John Coltrane) 6:39
5 I Want to Talk About You (Billy Eckstine) 9:52
6 My Favorite Things (Rodgers & Hammerstein) 13:57
Notes
Disc 1 and Disc 2, #1 recorded live in Berlin; November 2, 1963.
Disc 2, #2-6 recorded live in Stockholm; October 22, 1963.

Bass – Jimmy Garrison
Drums – Elvin Jones
Piano – McCoy Tyner
Tenor Saxophone, Soprano Saxophone – John Coltrane

BETH HART & JOE BONAMASSA – BLACK COFFEE (2018)

Album Cover Beth Hart & Joe Bonamassa - Black Coffee

Third Album by Blues Rock Duo

This is a powerhouse album, intense, emotional, full of energy and pure passion. It will leave you exhausted and relaxed from their musical workout by the end. And you’ll be ready to play it all over again. Beth Hart and Joe Bonamassa have put together their third album and they’ve left nothing behind.

Deep Historical Roots

This is great blues-rock, with horns, backing vocals, Bonamassa’s varied gritty and controlled guitar playing, and Beth Hart’s incredible voice and singing style.  Her sound is unquestionably her own, but she certainly invites some great influences on these covers, from Ella Fitzgerald, Nina Simone, and Etta James to Janis Joplin.  There’s some pretty impressive band support here too. If the first four tunes don’t blow you away it may be time for a check-up.

Originals Re-imagined

You may recognize a few of these from the originals, but other interpretations, likely not — check out Addicted by Waldeck. And check out whatever other originals you might like. The interpretations on this album are simply wonderful. I look forward to their next project together but in the meantime, this will keep me going quite nicely for a very long time.

TRACK                                               ORIGINAL ARTIST                                          

1. Give It Everything You Got             Edgar Winter

2. Damn Your Eyes                                 Etta James

4. Lullaby of the Leaves                      Connee Boswell

5. Why Don’t You Do Right                 Lil Green

6. Saved                                                       LaVern Baker

7. Sitting on Top of the World           Mississippi Sheiks

8. Joy                                                             Lucinda Williams

9. Soul on Fire                                           LaVern Baker and Orchestra

10. Addicted                                               Waldeck

Musicians

Joe Bonamassa – guitar;  Beth Hart – vocals;   Rob McNelley – rhythm guitar;  Michael Rhodes – bass guitar;  Anton Fig – drums, percussion;  Reese Wynans – keyboards;  Paulie Cerra – tenor saxophone, baritone saxophone;  Ron Dzuibla – tenor saxophone, baritone saxophone;  Lee Thornburg – trumpet, trombone;  Jade Macreae – backing vocals;  Juanita Tippins – backing vocals;  Mahalia Barnes – backing vocals.

Production

Kevin Shirley – production;  Rob Katz – engineering;  Bob Ludwig – mastering;  Jaramiah Rios – engineering assistance;  Kevin Luu – engineering assistance;  Roy Weisman – executive production;  Lowell Reynolds – recording; Ben Rodgers – recording Ron Dziubla – recording. 

  • Released January 26, 2018 
  • Recorded August 18–21, 2016
  • Genre: Soul, Blues
  • Length: 44:41
  • Label: J&R Adventures
  • Mascot Label Producer: Kevin Shirley

LEON BRIDGES – COMING HOME (2015)

THE SOUND OF YESTERDAY AND TODAY

This is a pure trip back in time. Leon Bridges, only in his mid-twenties, put together his original tunes together but wrapped them in a classic R & B and soul sound of the 1960s.

STRONG WITH SOME, NOT QUITE WITH OTHERS

The song structures, with background singers and horns galore, give this a really warm and recognizable sound. While the album is somewhat uneven, there are several strong songs — Coming Home, Better Man, and Smooth Sailin’ are probably the best cuts on here. Although this is a great sounding album with some solid songwriting, there are places that feel a little underwhelming. Bridges just doesn’t seem to put everything into all of the songs. The emotion in his vocals seems to be missing in a few places.

A VERY GOOD FIRST ALBUM

Overall though, a very good first album, particularly if you crave that 1960s soul experience. If that’s where you’re most comfortable, then this certainly is home. Perhaps the second album nails it consistently, I will be checking it out soon. But he’s off to a very good start here.

Continue reading “LEON BRIDGES – COMING HOME (2015)”

GINGER BAKER – WHY? (2014)

Ginger Baker released Why? in 2014, his last album to date, and his first since Coward of the County in 1999.  Dedicated to his late first wife and artist Liz Baker, the album continues Baker’s journey in jazz that began in his pre-Cream rock days and has taken on various forms since the 1970s.

He revisits some of his older material along with Wayne Shorter’s Footprints and Sonny Rollins’ St. Thomas. There is a strong and clear percussive foundation throughout the album with Baker’s steady drumming and Abass Dodoo’s work on percussion. The African rhythm influences keep this album intriguing even though it is certainly a more restrained jazz approach than it could have been. Pee Wee Ellis is on Sax and Alee Dankworth on Bass. Both are accomplished and seasoned musicians.

The hi-hat keeps the rhythm throughout the whole record, something that you might enjoy, or possibly find a bit annoying. Either way, this is a good addition to Baker’s catalogue and can be enjoyed by jazzers and rockers alike.

Continue reading “GINGER BAKER – WHY? (2014)”